컨텐츠로 이동
 The shadows of reading: Reasons for the bad results... 해당 항목을 미리보기
닫기해당 항목을 미리보기
해당 아이템을 전자로 보기 위한 자원 선택하기

The shadows of reading: Reasons for the bad results of Bulgarians in PISA studies

저자: Tsvetkova, Milena
출판사: RUS 2017-11-07T11:39:15Z 2017-11-07T11:39:15Z 2016
판/형식:   내려받기 가능한 기록 자료
요약:
English: The subject of this article are the factors and reasons for the bad results in reading of the Bulgarian 15-year-old students in PISA's international studies. The reference points of the analysis are the critical results from the last four studies - 2000, 2006, 2009 and 2012. The aim of this analysis is to bring up for discussion unformulated topics and reading angles which have not been covered, which may  더 읽기…
평가:

기반으로 3 평가 0 리뷰와 함께 - 첫번째로 올려주세요.

주제
다음과 같습니다:

온라인으로 문서 찾기

이 항목에 대한 링크

도서관에서 사본 찾기

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 해당항목을 보유하고 있는 도서관을 찾는 중

상세정보

장르/형태: Zeitschriftenartikel
Journal article
자료 유형: 인터넷 자료
문서 유형 기록 자료, 인터넷 자원
모든 저자 / 참여자: Tsvetkova, Milena
OCLC 번호: 1015625055

초록:

English: The subject of this article are the factors and reasons for the bad results in reading of the Bulgarian 15-year-old students in PISA's international studies. The reference points of the analysis are the critical results from the last four studies - 2000, 2006, 2009 and 2012. The aim of this analysis is to bring up for discussion unformulated topics and reading angles which have not been covered, which may explain the reason for the critical results in reading, including in the European Union as a whole. The goals of the report are to look for arguments and evidence in communication theory, in the conclusions of sociological studies and to summarize the factors which may lessen the ongoing preoccupation with "mass non-reading" or the "drop in reader's literacy". Eight reasons for the critical state of reading literacy have been drawn: 1) basic illiteracies which stem from the incorrect attitude towards reading as a cultural technology; 2) the stereotype "book = literature"; 3) the stereotype "book = paper"; 4) helplessness of sociological tools; 5) the manipulative side of reading; 6) the harmful side of reading; 7) reading mutations; 8) the erroneous statement "Young people do not read". The scientists are presented with proposals to concentrate on two academic points: "Theory and practice of reading" classes on each educational level and focusing research efforts to improve readership culture of adults, including development of the so called "Acmeology of reading."

리뷰

사용자-기여 리뷰
GoodReads 리뷰 가져오는 중…
DOGObooks 리뷰를 가지고 오는 중…

태그

모든 사용자 태그 (8)

가장 인기있는 태그 보기 태그 리스트 | 태그 구름

요청하신 것을 확인하기

이 항목을 이미 요청하셨을 수도 있습니다. 만약 이 요청을 계속해서 진행하시려면 Ok을 선택하세요.

윈도우 닫기

WorldCat에 로그인 하십시오 

계정이 없으세요? 아주 간단한 절차를 통하여 무료 계정을 만드실 수 있습니다.