• Citar/Exportar
  Citar/Exportar

  Copiar una cita

  APA (6a ed.)

  

  Chicago (Autor-Fecha, 15a ed.)

  

  Harvard (18a ed.)

  

  MLA (7a ed.)

  

  Turabian (6a ed.)

  

  Exportar una cita

  Exportar a RefWorks   Exportar a EndNote / Referen ce Manager   Exportar a EasyBib
  Exportar a End Note/ Reference Manager (no latín)   Cancelar y volver

  Nota
• Imprimir
• Correo-e
  Correo-e

  Todos los campos son obligatorios.

  La/s dirección/ones de correo-e son obligatorias. Ingrese la/s dirección/ones del correo-e del destinatorio:

  La/s dirección/ones de correo-e que ha ingresado no tiene/n un formato válido. Vuelva a inscribir la/s dirección/ones del correo-e del destinatorio.

  Puede enviar este material a hasta cinco recipientes.

  Ingresar la(s) dirección(es) del correo-e del destinatorio: Separar hasta cinco direcciones de comas (,)

  El campo de nombre es obligatorio. Ingrese su nombre.

  Entrar su nombre: El campo de tema es obligatorio. Ingrese el tema. Tema:

  El campo de mensaje de correo-e es obligatorio. Ingrese el mensaje.

  Mensaje de correo-e: Puede ver un material de posible interés en http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/7494878183 Título The shadows of reading: Reasons for the bad results of bulgarians in PISA studies Editorial: ISBN/ISSN: 2305-6746 OCLC:7494878183

  
  

  Por favor, verifique que no es un robot.

  Cancelar y volver
• Compartir
• Permalink
  Permalink

  Copiar este URL para enlazar a esta página:

• Escribir una reseña
• Calificar este material:
• • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

The shadows of reading: Reasons for the bad results of bulgarians in PISA studies

Autor:	Milena I Tsvetkova
Edición/Formato:	Artículo
Fuente:	European Journal of Contemporary Education, v17 n3 (2016): 368-377
Resumen:	The subject of this article are the factors and reasons for the bad results in reading of the Bulgarian 15-year-old students in PISA’s international studies. The reference points of the analysis are the critical results from the last four studies - 2000, 2006, 2009 and 2012. The aim of this analysis is to bring up for discussion unformulated topics and reading angles which have not been covered, which may explain the reason for the critical results in reading, including in the European Union as a whole. The goals of the report are to look for arguments and evidence in communication theory, in the conclusions of sociological studies and to summarize the factors which may lessen the ongoing preoccupation with “mass non-reading” or the “drop in reader’s literacy”. Eight reasons for the critical state of reading literacy have been drawn: 1) basic illiteracies which stem from the incorrect attitude towards reading as a culturaltechnology; 2) the stereotype “book = literature”; 3) the stereotype “book = paper”; 4) helplessness of sociological tools; 5) the manipulative side of reading; 6) the harmful side of reading; 7) reading mutations; 8) the erroneous statement “Young people do not read”... The subject of this article are the factors and reasons for the bad results in reading of the Bulgarian 15-year-old students in PISA’s international studies. The reference points of the analysis are the critical results from the last four studies - 2000, 2006, 2009 and 2012. The aim of this analysis is to bring up for discussion unformulated topics and reading angles which have not been covered, which may explain the reason for the critical results in reading, including in the European Union as a whole. The goals of the report are to look for arguments and evidence in communication theory, in the conclusions of sociological studies and to summarize the factors which may lessen the ongoing preoccupation with “mass non-reading” or the “drop in reader’s literacy”. Eight reasons for the critical state of reading literacy have been drawn: 1) basic illiteracies which stem from the incorrect attitude towards reading as a culturaltechnology; 2) the stereotype “book = literature”; 3) the stereotype “book = paper”; 4) helplessness of sociological tools; 5) the manipulative side of reading; 6) the harmful side of reading; 7) reading mutations; 8) the erroneous statement “Young people do not read”. The scientists are presented with proposals to concentrate on two academic points: “Theory and practice of reading” classes on each educational level and focusing research efforts to improve readership culture of adults, including development of the so called “Acmeology of reading”. function show_abstract() { $('#abstract1').hide(); $('#abstract2').show(); $('#abstract_expand').hide(); } ▼Показать полностью  Leer más
Calificación:	basada en 1 calificación/es 0 con reseñas - Ser el primero.
Más materiales como éste	Etiquetas de usurarios Listas de usuarios
Buscar en esta publicación otros artículos con las palabras siguientes: