• Cita/Esporta
  Cita/Esporta

  Copia una citazione

  APA (6th ed.)

  

  Chicago (Authore-Data, 15. ed.)

  

  Harvard (18. ed.)

  

  MLA (7. ed.)

  

  Turabian (6. ed.)

  

  Esporta una citazione

  Esporta in RefWorks   Esporta su EndNote / Gestione Reference   Esporta in EasyBib
  Esporta su EndNote / Reference Manager (non-Latin)   Annulla e trona indietro

  Nota
• Stampa
• Email
  Email

  Tutti i campi sono obbligatori.

  Il campo email è obbligatorio. Inserisci l'indirizzo(i) e-mail.

  L’indirizzo email inserito non è in un formato corretto. Inserirlo nuovamente.

  Puoi inviare questo documento ad un massimo di cinque destinatari.

  Inserisci indirizzi email destinatari: Separa al massimo 5 indirizzi con la virgola (,)

  Il campo nome è obbligatorio. Inserisci il tuo nome.

  Inserisci il tuo nome: Il campo soggetto è obbligatorio. Inserisci il soggetto. Soggetto:

  Il campo messaggio email è obbligatorio. Inserire il messaggio.

  Messaggio email: Credo tu possa essere interessato a questo documento su http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/7494878183 Titolo: The shadows of reading: Reasons for the bad results of bulgarians in PISA studies Pubblicazione: ISBN/ISSN: 2305-6746 OCLC:7494878183

  
  

  Si prega di confermare che non sei un robot.

  Annulla e trona indietro
• Condividi
• Link permanente
  Link permanente

  Copia questo URL per creare un link a questa pagina:

• Scrivi un commento
• Vota questo documento:
• • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

The shadows of reading: Reasons for the bad results of bulgarians in PISA studies

Autore:	Milena I Tsvetkova
Edizione/Formato:	Articolo
Fonte:	European Journal of Contemporary Education, v17 n3 (2016): 368-377
Sommario:	The subject of this article are the factors and reasons for the bad results in reading of the Bulgarian 15-year-old students in PISA’s international studies. The reference points of the analysis are the critical results from the last four studies - 2000, 2006, 2009 and 2012. The aim of this analysis is to bring up for discussion unformulated topics and reading angles which have not been covered, which may explain the reason for the critical results in reading, including in the European Union as a whole. The goals of the report are to look for arguments and evidence in communication theory, in the conclusions of sociological studies and to summarize the factors which may lessen the ongoing preoccupation with “mass non-reading” or the “drop in reader’s literacy”. Eight reasons for the critical state of reading literacy have been drawn: 1) basic illiteracies which stem from the incorrect attitude towards reading as a culturaltechnology; 2) the stereotype “book = literature”; 3) the stereotype “book = paper”; 4) helplessness of sociological tools; 5) the manipulative side of reading; 6) the harmful side of reading; 7) reading mutations; 8) the erroneous statement “Young people do not read”... The subject of this article are the factors and reasons for the bad results in reading of the Bulgarian 15-year-old students in PISA’s international studies. The reference points of the analysis are the critical results from the last four studies - 2000, 2006, 2009 and 2012. The aim of this analysis is to bring up for discussion unformulated topics and reading angles which have not been covered, which may explain the reason for the critical results in reading, including in the European Union as a whole. The goals of the report are to look for arguments and evidence in communication theory, in the conclusions of sociological studies and to summarize the factors which may lessen the ongoing preoccupation with “mass non-reading” or the “drop in reader’s literacy”. Eight reasons for the critical state of reading literacy have been drawn: 1) basic illiteracies which stem from the incorrect attitude towards reading as a culturaltechnology; 2) the stereotype “book = literature”; 3) the stereotype “book = paper”; 4) helplessness of sociological tools; 5) the manipulative side of reading; 6) the harmful side of reading; 7) reading mutations; 8) the erroneous statement “Young people do not read”. The scientists are presented with proposals to concentrate on two academic points: “Theory and practice of reading” classes on each educational level and focusing research efforts to improve readership culture of adults, including development of the so called “Acmeology of reading”. function show_abstract() { $('#abstract1').hide(); $('#abstract2').show(); $('#abstract_expand').hide(); } ▼Показать полностью  Per saperne di più…
Voto:	basato su 1 voto(i) 0 con commenti - Diventa il primo.
Altri come questo	Etichette degli utenti Liste di utenti
Cerca altri articoli in questa pubblicazione con le seguenti parole: