Refugee Program: Initial Reception and Placement of New Arrivals should be improved. Report to the Chairmen Committee on the Judiciary. United States Senate and Committee on the Judiciary. House of Representatives. (書籍, 1986) [WorldCat.org]
コンテンツへ移動
Refugee Program: Initial Reception and Placement of New Arrivals should be improved. Report to the Chairmen Committee on the Judiciary. United States Senate and Committee on the Judiciary. House of Representatives. 資料のプレビュー
閉じる資料のプレビュー
確認中…

Refugee Program: Initial Reception and Placement of New Arrivals should be improved. Report to the Chairmen Committee on the Judiciary. United States Senate and Committee on the Judiciary. House of Representatives.

著者: United States. General Accounting Office.
出版社: Washington (DC), 1986.
エディション/フォーマット:   紙書籍 : Englishすべてのエディションとフォーマットを見る
概要:
The General Accounting Office (GAO) made an audit of 1984/85 federal fund expenditure under the State Department's initial refugee reception and placement programme. The great majority of refugees included in the analysis received the required core services (food, clothing, shelter and general employment-related services). About 15% of the refugees in the sample were employed at the time of the study. Numerous  続きを読む
評価:

(まだ評価がありません) 0 件のレビュー - 是非あなたから!

件名:
関連情報:

オフラインで入手

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; この資料の所蔵館を検索中…

詳細

ドキュメントの種類 書籍
すべての著者/寄与者: United States. General Accounting Office.
OCLC No.: 822542518
メモ: GAO NSIAD-86-69.
物理形態: 79 pages : tabl., annexes

概要:

The General Accounting Office (GAO) made an audit of 1984/85 federal fund expenditure under the State Department's initial refugee reception and placement programme. The great majority of refugees included in the analysis received the required core services (food, clothing, shelter and general employment-related services). About 15% of the refugees in the sample were employed at the time of the study. Numerous reasons were given for refugee unemployment, some of a potential long-term nature and others temporary (e.g. the need to learn English). GAO also made a number of criticisms of the programme. For example, it is unclear if the 90-day initial resettlement programme should focus on employment or on the survival core services. In addition, refugee self-sufficiency has not been defined. Furthermore, no system of measuring the results of voluntary agencies' efforts to provide core services and instil the need for employment is in use. The State Department places few restrictions on agencies' use of funds and has little basis for evaluating the appropriateness of expenditure. GAO makes recommendations on the need for programme goal clarification, performance standards and financial accountability.

レビュー

ユーザーレビュー
GoodReadsのレビューを取得中…
DOGObooksのレビューを取得中…

タグ

まずはあなたから!
リクエストの確認

あなたは既にこの資料をリクエストしている可能性があります。このリクエストを続行してよろしければ、OK を選択してください。

ウインドウを閉じる

WorldCatにログインしてください 

アカウントをお持ちではないですか?簡単に 無料アカウントを作成することができます。.