Refugee Program: Initial Reception and Placement of New Arrivals should be improved. Report to the Chairmen Committee on the Judiciary. United States Senate and Committee on the Judiciary. House of Representatives. (圖書, 1986) [WorldCat.org]
跳至内容
Refugee Program: Initial Reception and Placement of New Arrivals should be improved. Report to the Chairmen Committee on the Judiciary. United States Senate and Committee on the Judiciary. House of Representatives. 線上預覽
關閉線上預覽
正在檢查...

Refugee Program: Initial Reception and Placement of New Arrivals should be improved. Report to the Chairmen Committee on the Judiciary. United States Senate and Committee on the Judiciary. House of Representatives.

作者: United States. General Accounting Office.
出版商: Washington (DC), 1986.
版本/格式:   打印圖書 : 英語所有版本和格式的總覽
提要:
The General Accounting Office (GAO) made an audit of 1984/85 federal fund expenditure under the State Department's initial refugee reception and placement programme. The great majority of refugees included in the analysis received the required core services (food, clothing, shelter and general employment-related services). About 15% of the refugees in the sample were employed at the time of the study. Numerous  再讀一些...
評定級別:

(尚未評分) 0 附有評論 - 成爲第一個。

主題
更多類似這樣的

在圖書館查詢

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 正在查詢有此資料的圖書館...

詳細書目

文件類型 圖書
所有的作者/貢獻者: United States. General Accounting Office.
OCLC系統控制編碼: 822542518
註釋: GAO NSIAD-86-69.
描述: 79 pages : tabl., annexes

摘要:

The General Accounting Office (GAO) made an audit of 1984/85 federal fund expenditure under the State Department's initial refugee reception and placement programme. The great majority of refugees included in the analysis received the required core services (food, clothing, shelter and general employment-related services). About 15% of the refugees in the sample were employed at the time of the study. Numerous reasons were given for refugee unemployment, some of a potential long-term nature and others temporary (e.g. the need to learn English). GAO also made a number of criticisms of the programme. For example, it is unclear if the 90-day initial resettlement programme should focus on employment or on the survival core services. In addition, refugee self-sufficiency has not been defined. Furthermore, no system of measuring the results of voluntary agencies' efforts to provide core services and instil the need for employment is in use. The State Department places few restrictions on agencies' use of funds and has little basis for evaluating the appropriateness of expenditure. GAO makes recommendations on the need for programme goal clarification, performance standards and financial accountability.

評論

讀者提供的評論
正在擷取GoodReads評論...
正在擷取DOGObooks的評論

標籤

成爲第一個
確認申請

你可能已經申請過這份資料。若還是想申請,請選確認。

關閉視窗

請登入WorldCat 

没有帳號嗎?你可很容易的 建立免費的帳號.