The shadows of reading: Reasons for the bad results of bulgarians in PISA studies (文章, 2016) [WorldCat.org]
跳到内容
The shadows of reading: Reasons for the bad results of bulgarians in PISA studies
关闭预览资料
正在检查...

The shadows of reading: Reasons for the bad results of bulgarians in PISA studies

著者: Milena I Tsvetkova
版本/格式: 文章 文章
资源:European Journal of Contemporary Education, v17 n3 (2016): 368-377
提要:
The subject of this article are the factors and reasons for the bad results in reading of the Bulgarian 15-year-old students in PISA’s international studies. The reference points of the analysis are the critical results from the last four studies - 2000, 2006, 2009 and 2012. The aim of this analysis is to bring up for discussion unformulated topics and reading angles which have not been covered, which may explain  再读一些...
评估:

根据 1 评估等级 0 附有评论 - 争取成为第一个。

更多类似这样的

在线查找

与期刊/刊物的链接

在图书馆查找

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 正在查找有这资料的图书馆...

详细书目

文档类型 文章
所有的著者/提供者: Milena I Tsvetkova
ISSN:2305-6746
专有的标识符 7494878183
奖励:

摘要:

The subject of this article are the factors and reasons for the bad results in reading of the Bulgarian 15-year-old students in PISA’s international studies. The reference points of the analysis are the critical results from the last four studies - 2000, 2006, 2009 and 2012. The aim of this analysis is to bring up for discussion unformulated topics and reading angles which have not been covered, which may explain the reason for the critical results in reading, including in the European Union as a whole. The goals of the report are to look for arguments and evidence in communication theory, in the conclusions of sociological studies and to summarize the factors which may lessen the ongoing preoccupation with “mass non-reading” or the “drop in reader’s literacy”. Eight reasons for the critical state of reading literacy have been drawn: 1) basic illiteracies which stem from the incorrect attitude towards reading as a culturaltechnology; 2) the stereotype “book = literature”; 3) the stereotype “book = paper”; 4) helplessness of sociological tools; 5) the manipulative side of reading; 6) the harmful side of reading; 7) reading mutations; 8) the erroneous statement “Young people do not read”... The subject of this article are the factors and reasons for the bad results in reading of the Bulgarian 15-year-old students in PISA’s international studies. The reference points of the analysis are the critical results from the last four studies - 2000, 2006, 2009 and 2012. The aim of this analysis is to bring up for discussion unformulated topics and reading angles which have not been covered, which may explain the reason for the critical results in reading, including in the European Union as a whole. The goals of the report are to look for arguments and evidence in communication theory, in the conclusions of sociological studies and to summarize the factors which may lessen the ongoing preoccupation with “mass non-reading” or the “drop in reader’s literacy”. Eight reasons for the critical state of reading literacy have been drawn: 1) basic illiteracies which stem from the incorrect attitude towards reading as a culturaltechnology; 2) the stereotype “book = literature”; 3) the stereotype “book = paper”; 4) helplessness of sociological tools; 5) the manipulative side of reading; 6) the harmful side of reading; 7) reading mutations; 8) the erroneous statement “Young people do not read”. The scientists are presented with proposals to concentrate on two academic points: “Theory and practice of reading” classes on each educational level and focusing research efforts to improve readership culture of adults, including development of the so called “Acmeology of reading”. function show_abstract() { $('#abstract1').hide(); $('#abstract2').show(); $('#abstract_expand').hide(); } ▼Показать полностью

评论

用户提供的评论
正在获取GoodReads评论...
正在检索DOGObooks的评论

标签

所有的用户标签 (6)

查看最热门的标签,展示的形式是: 标签列表 | 标签云(tag cloud)

  • bulgaria  (白俄罗斯(Belarus) 1 个人)
  • illiteracy  (白俄罗斯(Belarus) 1 个人)
  • media literacy  (白俄罗斯(Belarus) 1 个人)
  • pisa  (白俄罗斯(Belarus) 1 个人)
  • reading  (白俄罗斯(Belarus) 1 个人)
  • reading literacy  (白俄罗斯(Belarus) 1 个人)

相似资料

这资料的用户列表 (1)

确认申请

你可能已经申请过这份资料。如果还是想申请,请选确认。

关闭窗口

请登入WorldCat 

没有张号吗?很容易就可以 建立免费的账号.