The shadows of reading: Reasons for the bad results of bulgarians in PISA studies (文章, 2016) [WorldCat.org]
跳至内容
The shadows of reading: Reasons for the bad results of bulgarians in PISA studies
關閉線上預覽
正在檢查...

The shadows of reading: Reasons for the bad results of bulgarians in PISA studies

作者: Milena I Tsvetkova
版本/格式: 文章 文章
資源:European Journal of Contemporary Education, v17 n3 (2016): 368-377
提要:
The subject of this article are the factors and reasons for the bad results in reading of the Bulgarian 15-year-old students in PISA’s international studies. The reference points of the analysis are the critical results from the last four studies - 2000, 2006, 2009 and 2012. The aim of this analysis is to bring up for discussion unformulated topics and reading angles which have not been covered, which may explain  再讀一些...
評定級別:

依據 1 評分 0 附有評論 - 成爲第一個。

更多類似這樣的

在線上查詢

與此期刊/刊物的連結

在圖書館查詢

&AllPage.SpinnerRetrieving; 正在查詢有此資料的圖書館...

詳細書目

文件類型 文章
所有的作者/貢獻者: Milena I Tsvetkova
ISSN:2305-6746
專有的識別號: 7494878183
獎賞:

摘要:

The subject of this article are the factors and reasons for the bad results in reading of the Bulgarian 15-year-old students in PISA’s international studies. The reference points of the analysis are the critical results from the last four studies - 2000, 2006, 2009 and 2012. The aim of this analysis is to bring up for discussion unformulated topics and reading angles which have not been covered, which may explain the reason for the critical results in reading, including in the European Union as a whole. The goals of the report are to look for arguments and evidence in communication theory, in the conclusions of sociological studies and to summarize the factors which may lessen the ongoing preoccupation with “mass non-reading” or the “drop in reader’s literacy”. Eight reasons for the critical state of reading literacy have been drawn: 1) basic illiteracies which stem from the incorrect attitude towards reading as a culturaltechnology; 2) the stereotype “book = literature”; 3) the stereotype “book = paper”; 4) helplessness of sociological tools; 5) the manipulative side of reading; 6) the harmful side of reading; 7) reading mutations; 8) the erroneous statement “Young people do not read”... The subject of this article are the factors and reasons for the bad results in reading of the Bulgarian 15-year-old students in PISA’s international studies. The reference points of the analysis are the critical results from the last four studies - 2000, 2006, 2009 and 2012. The aim of this analysis is to bring up for discussion unformulated topics and reading angles which have not been covered, which may explain the reason for the critical results in reading, including in the European Union as a whole. The goals of the report are to look for arguments and evidence in communication theory, in the conclusions of sociological studies and to summarize the factors which may lessen the ongoing preoccupation with “mass non-reading” or the “drop in reader’s literacy”. Eight reasons for the critical state of reading literacy have been drawn: 1) basic illiteracies which stem from the incorrect attitude towards reading as a culturaltechnology; 2) the stereotype “book = literature”; 3) the stereotype “book = paper”; 4) helplessness of sociological tools; 5) the manipulative side of reading; 6) the harmful side of reading; 7) reading mutations; 8) the erroneous statement “Young people do not read”. The scientists are presented with proposals to concentrate on two academic points: “Theory and practice of reading” classes on each educational level and focusing research efforts to improve readership culture of adults, including development of the so called “Acmeology of reading”. function show_abstract() { $('#abstract1').hide(); $('#abstract2').show(); $('#abstract_expand').hide(); } ▼Показать полностью

評論

讀者提供的評論
正在擷取GoodReads評論...
正在擷取DOGObooks的評論

標籤

所有的讀者標籤 (6)

檢視最熱門的標籤,呈現的形式是: 標籤我的最愛清單 | 標籤雲(tag cloud)

  • bulgaria  (白俄羅斯(Belarus) 1 個人)
  • illiteracy  (白俄羅斯(Belarus) 1 個人)
  • media literacy  (白俄羅斯(Belarus) 1 個人)
  • pisa  (白俄羅斯(Belarus) 1 個人)
  • reading  (白俄羅斯(Belarus) 1 個人)
  • reading literacy  (白俄羅斯(Belarus) 1 個人)

類似資料

提供給讀者有關此資料的清單 (1)

確認申請

你可能已經申請過這份資料。若還是想申請,請選確認。

關閉視窗

請登入WorldCat 

没有帳號嗎?你可很容易的 建立免費的帳號.